Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Composability of QUIC Extensions (#3332)

Lucas Pardue <> Fri, 10 January 2020 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70373120133 for <>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:23:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSly6Il2RZYq for <>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:23:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92FB3120047 for <>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:23:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECE58C0511 for <>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:23:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1578698611; bh=A2tecd56H4PJNx3JJ6HkCoAC7t0Q0lZp0C5bBY7Md/c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NIjl634V1+vO21g34It11lpeDQ9WWKeCgBUA/NKa8agAVL/RGYNtuu2kq9iMJdTCs BO2UH/YR7LUYGjfb9Z/9b9es1kBX8YDiobauDcoCxRUmjWZ9YpdbReMt7xvGqqvKML jMYw0KcRuBd4u63LIattVmwc5Kd39+dAyjDFJbmM=
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:23:31 -0800
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3332/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Composability of QUIC Extensions (#3332)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e190773df769_2b5f3f93d40cd96822916d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 23:23:34 -0000

My initial thoughts were that composing A and B could result in the explicit definition of ACK_A_B, defined in some document that says only ACK_A_B is allowed, with reception of ACK_A or ACK_B being a simple explicit error.

I see that is an over simplistic view. I agree we shouldn't overthink the problem before it is at hand.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: