Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)

Marten Seemann <> Fri, 07 February 2020 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDE41200F5 for <>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dmaqs0boxbOL for <>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:56:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E505B12003E for <>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 23:56:18 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1581062178; bh=2oLTmr4neoFGSD1TeN0ORe71daEag+VeddxbqvVFUmk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZRjO0DK49749jnWTQOjyM1QE367wP7Jyku7HVfOq50wubMTG//pRR6o7WpCm+C94J 4EXB0DljT+NWY6zYbqbg2hxl1eQdvo7rb+kaf3UkBSjspN8zh7u9t/zPmd6V+3vFU2 IQ7jCav7jiCRkIPTtxsBUK2c7s7X+SzqRowR0ZuI=
From: Marten Seemann <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3429/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A fixed transport parameter profile is legitimate (#3429)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3d1822ab93d_43743ffa858cd95c7646b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:56:21 -0000

> In the past, we have had the principle that either endpoint not condition its choice of transport parameter values based on anything from its peer. We should maintain this principle throughout.

@martinthomson Where did we use this principle in the past? I can't remember that we said anything like that.
Since we're using transport parameters to negotiate extensions (and extensions might use the value of the TP to negotiate *something*), I don't think this is a viable principle to follow.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: