Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Request to Retire Locally Issued CIDs (#2769)

[Nick Banks <[e-mail]>]

nibanks commented on this pull request.



> @@ -5018,6 +5042,35 @@ sequence number, or if a sequence number is used for different connection
 IDs, the endpoint MAY treat that receipt as a connection error of type
 PROTOCOL_VIOLATION.
 
+The Retire Prior To field is a request for the peer to retire all connection IDs
+with a sequence number less than the specified value.  This includes the initial
+and preferred_address transport parameter connection IDs.  The peer SHOULD
+immediately retire all the connection IDs.

To be clear, you suggesting I remove these two paragraphs?

> If a stateless reset is received in response to a retired connection ID, the
> reset SHOULD be ignored and the receiver SHOULD immediately switch to a
> connection ID that has not been retired if it has not done so already.
> 
> In order to prevent a heavily delayed packet with a retired connection ID from
> eliciting a stateless reset that closes the connection, the stateless reset
> token of the retired connection IDs SHOULD NOT be reused.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2769#discussion_r292689902