Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove amplification throttle if the server receives Initial that echoes its high entropy SCID. (#3834)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Fri, 10 July 2020 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE95E3A08A2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.059, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qng6LR4a7ufp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-11.smtp.github.com (out-11.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE27D3A0888 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-c53a806.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-c53a806.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.45]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C88261639 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1594408871; bh=XPJhju531fqvfosPodtLtsWiNDEZtw2fTh5h76wowOs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=x7nqagBSrDC/w32E+j+hBEEvOlPU0pO4jQBu+gC7S8MLxyd3lWMUuw/2LBXiDgspL zTAqe7kTrZvLhieS5FtnZpD9xbUS4DeeM9XGHdwt3ga98XU3LSbEIWGrNdZ2n1IAcS ShrnIB64eRFGJi9RfAVBqjyutV3XsRx0LG4c8Q8Y=
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:21:10 -0700
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5LZYCHURAAOAVPWXF5CSQKNEVBNHHCN2E4VA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3834/656849116@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3834@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3834@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove amplification throttle if the server receives Initial that echoes its high entropy SCID. (#3834)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f08bfa6d0062_52853f9a0e6cd96813333b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/NA6K63w8neRGM19JGCa0VEPlgo4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:21:13 -0000

This is my take as well. What's the disadvantage of the text Ian proposes

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3834#issuecomment-656849116