IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow PRIORITY frames referring to placeholders exceeding `SETTING_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` (#2761)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 10 June 2019 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4BA12022A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id muqbIYcFezYZ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF3A12008D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:55:21 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1560192921; bh=WBhMNp5R3fjqKfQoyyWgoXv6wty8JpfLCWMgBsmVUFQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BF6Q5LDcXeIk5aI/26KXOc2sFHEefZKYfYR4i+xSTCD+/tA5XZAr71CV8xpALkuv6 yphKYM1wSTQlhEPHmD9OR8UNVkk00eb1BduN90GgJ0wtluXEEPyFXteha+kP58KMTN Qv2yUfzVdsZntanso2+z+cxYSPxvXkDmdi+9d5tM=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZHLP2TA5SFRT62CTV3BPNBTEVBNHHBVW7INY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761/review/247784063@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow PRIORITY frames referring to placeholders exceeding `SETTING_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` (#2761)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cfea79946293_6e0c3f96040cd9682517ec"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ND4ZwR15GopCV9p_ugZFrkNrYSs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 18:55:31 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1335,8 +1343,8 @@ The following settings are defined in HTTP/3:
   : The default value is unlimited.  See {{header-formatting}} for usage.
 
   SETTINGS_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS (0x9):
-  : The default value is 0.  However, this value SHOULD be set to a non-zero
-    value by servers.  See {{placeholders}} for usage.
+  : The default value is 0.  However, servers SHOULD set this value to 32 or

Wow, 32 is a large number.  If we keep exclusive prioritization, then Chrome will probably continue to use that, and Firefox doesn't use this many, so why such a high limit?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761#pullrequestreview-247784063

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email