Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK might be part of the exchange, but not (#2668)

afrind <> Tue, 07 May 2019 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073CE120226 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.464
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8Q5nLdXs6i7 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B5E120235 for <>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 13:40:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557261656; bh=MKMHmNNA1uANBAfgcHV5adQjt9PJK3ie6X2zmICB6FU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=k/W/SWWynG+I7wE1ImWYOlGocRHl1yFoDdkZkz6qqn0wuhCHlW/f6nSnJurQJes2h aZLVYAnt8zP26elWskIttcIkfozA4JzzFVawHz9XPGUYECIp9iluicUtMMvrgNujaE hauGOIRQs/c86sucp3hbbEP1NLgnj5ImtsepY6iw=
From: afrind <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2668/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK might be part of the exchange, but not (#2668)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd1ed58268c_9b43fdc612cd96834548d"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 20:40:59 -0000

afrind approved this pull request.

> @@ -942,6 +942,11 @@ A server MAY interleave one or more PUSH_PROMISE frames (see
 PUSH_PROMISE frames are not part of the response; see {{server-push}} for more
+The HEADERS and PUSH_PROMISE frames might reference concurrent updates to the
+QPACK table.  While these updates are not directly part of the message exchange,

I agree with Martin that we should say 'QPACK dynamic table' here.  

I'm not crazy about 'concurrent'.  What if we just said 'might reference updates'?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: