Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document request forgery (#3996)

Mike Bishop <> Wed, 19 August 2020 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C993A0A3A for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nUKo2ir_UP9Y for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DFD33A0A84 for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E3E840D6F for <>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1597845304; bh=bSiVGipwps3igGQruMnWrns+mOUTEZUWn1E5DAbzyTM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=EX0agD1B56er3Z5u6cWItfjkL1Fnx982WBRdeJ8E3+Q+Gngxsa2XRsKEZUlMPI6Wu 8DR4QtLKiXZQymShx6y1GOILLmYWWutjeDBSn8UDwFFhCJ4o+UPwMFs9YU1pUcTjDt aIgNtR6nbtCNgUiPa/brR9usBvGjvdeADgPuj398=
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:55:04 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3996/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document request forgery (#3996)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3d2f38a4823_25e919643582a5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:55:07 -0000

@MikeBishop commented on this pull request.

> +While it would be ideal if target services implement better protections, such
+as strong authentication that does not rely on implicit signals, the goal of
+this section is to describe what a QUIC implementation or deployment can do.

If you take Jana's suggestion, ~~the goal of~~

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: