Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Required state for retaining unacked RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames is unbound (#3509)

martinduke <> Wed, 01 April 2020 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786EC3A1445 for <>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOo_KRLWTXSz for <>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1A73A1444 for <>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480816A1283 for <>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585785054; bh=zJ43EEc1dvRm5s0p3+18/qcL0Vezo8d/1ILCRMd6mms=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=WSFwl5+Psji5XhEBni0TtByUQdjuhithirP5PiBxxrq/keXvM/kyOBpr2UYrBOhFK T5x0TFJLDQh/cUma7lUcxc8VHf1nnNgG6oSiEUw0Aq5O2VZ8E8m1o0TQgm8MnuX3Ix rQvhOUxM8wNU14tv8qZhrx4Y7C8Hnl9p2v60odaQ=
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 16:50:54 -0700
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3509/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Required state for retaining unacked RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames is unbound (#3509)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e8528de396cf_32233f8e4f2cd96410825c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 23:50:57 -0000

@kazuho I doubt that's less impactful on existing implementations, certainly from an interoperability standpoint. Today endpoints should hold on to incoming CIDs until they are formally retired. Making them leaky can lead to trapped state.

Sending them all, but with a delay, is no added state but solves this problem.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: