IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of loss and congestion of QUIC flows (#632)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Mon, 19 June 2017 03:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03901277BB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7U8h0HKVo3R for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8481275AB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=YhGAlt/oo6liXFXOaP/mjp+YLJs=; b=f9Mpw9niZb48YDvg vZhLWsM5Ch0pj2yPlPTwrjMvkfOjobkaPxAjP2ndyPjln25NL3Hp471I/FpYaUIR I7UtDkObyrcsCfkLg03qVOGisQZKYYURmNa+4rdG6tYAfprF25AalM7luh4L6jzj tVzYA+t4sWJ0qmBRTWZATFOQPKw=
Received: by filter0464p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0464p1mdw1-6037-59474AE8-17 2017-06-19 03:54:16.486441734 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id IuTvrBihTeq67t7F9T9O_g for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 03:54:16.515 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:54:16 -0700
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8c30f031d191f583e41cb5acceccf93356192f5192cf00000001155f0ce892a169ce0e0f95f5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632/309332680@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of loss and congestion of QUIC flows (#632)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59474ae85e034_320b3f7e1973fc2c70723"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2LqYUMN/aIedlI+1wiqDYLc4C1wCzHQ7XErn 1pvQ6WiyN6u9kvrbe8QGwKNXjuq0aWmI5rmvXLbVZQnCjw5xyFd/nbub0jDHVXt8jl7o1KQSHzxe2i PYcPWbS4tvFH0CS+FbH5BBtHKycVwS1RWZi6yxf4nc0kO/R5FgxyiL190YAMaMPFRTfYL6CdY4EmY0 8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ncd-m3sMmnjOSvuY1re8o896ALc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 03:54:25 -0000

Brian, how important really is this loss estimation? I don't think that losses can really be estimated by watching the congestion window. The variations of that window will depend on the specific algorithm implemented by the nodes, and also on the actual load. If this is really important, we may need to dedicate a "loss bit" in addition to the "latency bit". 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632#issuecomment-309332680

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status