IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Gratuitous change of QHKDF-Expand in draft 10 (#1255)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Fri, 30 March 2018 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35416126DCA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YdR01MAeeyGT for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B9C126C22 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=xqOqpKzSXFJPgA9c9YKpQLsW69Q=; b=dVU0X4YazvVxkLM8 eBf2sI2XJMdgbk2Mupsn5++Uhmo5qAt8HiUWcCviNdkYwqgwBRcEJ+AdV1vhWVI0 J1CcrHZtPSdT2OWwJg5/1CcC1w6kUZwfgI0cP/k3obPV8vCGrbdqgZhgwrYGOKXm 7KVeJaCDnFIvlysImoKRDVmNdWc=
Received: by filter0486p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0486p1mdw1-5534-5ABE46A9-23 2018-03-30 14:16:09.483973385 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) by ismtpd0006p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id VX_R5lfuRbKEJLCw73qPcQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:16:09.375 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:16:09 +0000
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab72a7dca36c68e8b02c2beb8ea1572f00a9e5af1b92cf0000000116d608a992a169ce1272420b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1255/377533452@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1255@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1255@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Gratuitous change of QHKDF-Expand in draft 10 (#1255)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5abe46a937de4_2c9d2ad82d2d6ed4430732"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3E8r8vzHmyZorJddc77EuZSKBnJeICLFloxE 7mNwHKdH43Gm0vNqAlnePyBF9w/GqhtzwHH49UHk3rUFQwjYiWYQ61tFrOdS+OuUYLAO6waaM1LtRH /rxgNT6kSiLxnxrv7C9XAWSZEcxrxfugXMJD3bRFZnBJB0a0Q74jKa/GnrzzedA4oCm+ziv3cQila7 0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ng0Co6zYD7V-WbrrjVdko-fSRcE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:16:13 -0000

I also feel the pain.

I think it is beneficial for most of us to be able to reuse the AEAD construction function that we have in our TLS stacks.

It might make sense to change BaseLabel  to something other than `tls13 `.

But I would prefer to keep all other parameters the same, so that the only change we need to make to our TLS stacks would be to provide a way of passing the BaseLabel as the argument.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1255#issuecomment-377533452

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status