Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification on TLP when sender is outpacing the timer (#1718)
"Arvid E. Picciani" <notifications@github.com> Thu, 06 September 2018 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA785130ECC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id da1ZIeNZplTO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08052130ECB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 09:35:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1536251744; bh=6hpnZRezm8etU2PuFNfmCthQjKspAi7uW3ikm5JN79A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0iViOxtQj4mGoAFE6bOkA/iFR26DYLmVlr0pk6rRIA94Xjgj3lIW/1D4A9atHt5Vs eMwvfusaJTfD4Om21gDi+yuYkXwVKZ1Vz+wIIhAibM/HPCVDRu+emF/mFe+tBkr0TH v9FUjvLiVmcD3egt+vhPLVr5PBXbD3Lud55pTCGc=
From: "Arvid E. Picciani" <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc04493d164d875d274c09274346f1d04254c49c992cf0000000117a9196092a169ce153af807@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718/419160142@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification on TLP when sender is outpacing the timer (#1718)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b915760de0c9_76c33faf31ad45c45884e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: aep
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/NomrrZT0wR26lzhfhbRyveDfTCo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:35:48 -0000
all of it ;) Currently i'm just counting seconds since the last received ack, but that doesnt detect paths that are alive but unusable because of high packet loss for example. There's probably alot more details in this that i simply don't know about. Should duplicated packets be filtered before the count? What about keepalive packets? Who sends them, when? etc -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718#issuecomment-419160142
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification on T… Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani