Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 02:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE0C12D873 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 19:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-t3ojfQFcvv for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 19:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0E612E8A6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 19:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 19:44:13 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1525920253; bh=4nNN1StOiFbUySOn37dt5qJTz9ZZAFDmbbsQBqIWfCE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=x4fCKDWhgMqnyW/xFoROuknrIEpqzYt3Dl1V6cuIbDenOZo7c8byPAs0IrO82evHH qUinbRsvtPPTHfbuRgWRMvJ9LLFiggwS4xKl+/pcqN6HayPLNRHQloWKfqjZ8ahi+O JKq0Cj+fMzgiPsSFr98CRwCQi7AuDWfuPDBCozVo=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcd8786a2481e5e6d570bf969a5b3ea46be031ddb92cf00000001170b73fd92a169ce131d70d9@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1339/c387935081@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1339@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1339@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5af3b1fd70a4c_7e8e2af7e8f54f508604a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/NsmD3q6n1Gjtup0aHuZ_AA9mKwY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 02:44:16 -0000
@MikeBishop: > Just to comment on this particular piece: The first byte of the long header is version-independent. The first byte of the short header is version-specific, except for the first bit. Would you mind elaborating why it is? By looking at the charts of [section 4 of the Invariants draft](https://quicwg.github.io/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-invariants.html#rfc.section.4), my understanding is that only the most significant bit is an invariant for both the long and the short header. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1339#issuecomment-387935081
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypt key phase (#1339) Martin Thomson