Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594)
Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 20:19 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AE5120232 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QkZ7OAui8_c for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01EA8120340 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:19:10 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554754750; bh=hfI3OBUcC/wHD5fvQTv+/VqLgxdasD+GLxtbVxrJ9/s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MQXPwfhlulNmhm3jfNj91S33yxo5cbFTDMlm6PJDDrhrrc6FaA9uXnUaAvrw1Fsnj 2SyVqOmky8LcCkt5kQknbzGB7POG9OqUG8fYn+3omIt5uZHLdaqaQPpi+y6f23w39w L0tTNtVlv4DfPvBzss6zUf70vIpemCFFzbg+46qA=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3957b3ee10e360df36f0f6d43c14b4b31d19d15e92cf0000000118c36ebe92a169ce19aaba39@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594/c480991387@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cabacbecbf68_31013f972ded45b427516a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ny9Th2DqdWtQkoTXcE-K-FgHhIg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 20:19:15 -0000
IMO this is clearly beyond the scope of QUICv1. Not all work going on with QUIC deserves a link from the main repo. It is straightforward to set up a separate GitHub repo following MTs instructions if you want your document source to be available. I also recommend the above suggestions, post an Individual Draft and promote the work on the mailing list. The working group can, at the chairs discretion, give consideration on if there is support to adopt the document etc. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2594#issuecomment-480991387
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#2594) Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Alexandre Ferrieux
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two Loss bits (Q&R) (#25… Mark Nottingham