Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove some cruft from packet size section (#3262)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 19 November 2019 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B554F120025 for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:33:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KEuMN4wFSxzF for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43631120071 for <>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:33:14 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1574127194; bh=byHaw+TIqt6dH4RqShve5tgpoUx4nNCfIXgh9gccNyc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=jY7aPXxcX0jXnGRWUAu9YJJBaFIJgV5d4RpGj0V9vNKLoSDRZG1oCAIrCXv+o0yx5 OAFFm60NSm016E8TKBfFYYpq2L3mZMbtHZJrNTC/UpFEhiu4u69QPhPCaq99W1irL1 SrZrh09UWcvjrURxGu7jBSMuseeIW6WTkYg6UTEA=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3262/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove some cruft from packet size section (#3262)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd3465a5c1b4_4f643fa7628cd96492239"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:33:17 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.

>  A server MAY send a CONNECTION_CLOSE frame with error code PROTOCOL_VIOLATION in
-response to the first Initial packet it receives from a client if the UDP
-datagram is smaller than 1200 bytes. It MUST NOT send any other frame type in
-response, or otherwise behave as if any part of the offending packet was
-processed as valid.
+response to an Initial packet it receives from a client if the UDP datagram is
+smaller than 1200 bytes. It MUST NOT send any other frame type in response, or

At that point, this is not creating the connection as opposed to removing an existing connection.  So this is functionally equivalent to dropping, but adds the friendly signal.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: