Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 23 January 2018 11:19 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DCA1200F1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:19:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q86xfKi6m6qt for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:19:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext3.iad.github.net [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87EE1200B9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:19:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:19:52 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1516706392; bh=Rhgjbv/ryByeMfu3vy0T6XHS6I90ZrP+ejy2d/+3ugc=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0AO/av32BWyUYYh2jtDqbKA4viKLJynTcx1ArY7LZoDj9REC+352Usryk35Qw/Oox ZD6OhESNpLTFfs6uTnPKaNHxvUyDMgyhiVuwvYPTqCWL5jbYYYzIFfESPIRoYHbPSa YPvMu0qHpwOhJ0uwGdqgUB/W4iOyCN+vAf+hcfaU=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab40dda08dc567a13d96c032f2eb27ce7a06b73b8a92cf00000001167edc5892a169ce10da444d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023/359760019@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a671a58a99cd_4de33f91047b6f2c3151cd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ODxIu6uWobNpjXp4B0yvu9u6cOw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:19:55 -0000
@martinduke, I don't think the suggestion was that we go back to a maximum number of open streams at a time. Rather, the idea is that you can both get a smaller encoding and make invalid values impossible by encoding the max stream ID as an initial stream count. That is, if a client sends `initial_max_streams_bidi=0x20`, the server would expand that as `0x20 << 2 + 0x00` and always produce a valid stream value. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1023#issuecomment-359760019
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-I… Martin Thomson