IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference RFC7661 for application limited (#2605)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 15 April 2019 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB8012019A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyLfcc2cg7Ib for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E241F12011D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:35:36 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1555356936; bh=zKojViVXf3f/DdEBcIG2vGu9BhMloBDz8OrgyorIfqg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RsRQvxNBHjl/qBErbo8vWPlg+HajkIvKV9LeYegL8jXfWi/IEv1rkbr1MPX4w3TjU Bsf5nfrWCli7kVZkjz1SkjpvTp0sJLL+iEFWB7kPOQFyiXv6q2LgiPcuMz5p56yQbH MP/yWAqKOYGM1hL3iBXBSnRQ/NibIBkcUOlMZeNo=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9ad2d9a70e9bfc5ad7fbada2fff76a6fc033285292cebac20f8892a169ce19bb17fa@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2605/review/226840014@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2605@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2605@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference RFC7661 for application limited (#2605)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb4dd08e5e55_319c3f84854d45c42278ed"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OG3qeUiKZUYoAGHedhcbjxH6MKY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 19:35:40 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



>  ## Application Limited Sending
 
-The congestion window should not be increased in slow start or congestion
-avoidance when it is not fully utilized.  The congestion window could be
-under-utilized due to insufficient application data or flow control credit.
+A sender's congestion window MUST NOT increase when no packets are newly
+acknowledged, such as when the connection is idle. The congestion window

This was written to specifically forbid the cubic bug, but I realize it's not even tight enough to do that, so I'll remove it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2605#discussion_r275513269

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email