Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative ref to RFC8085? (#3244)

Martin Thomson <> Mon, 18 November 2019 00:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A41120271 for <>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:08:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAG-hXEH0FBZ for <>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5796712025D for <>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:08:02 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1574035682; bh=exyqh/rMd5bM//oZp9h97bGFp9y1hciohFxUwEcjU/c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NJUK2am46eEYD4J/1EUUDltIk7GroTs/O473+pb3J4RlxZX+vEFGVE8fwKIl6oqWw tXM16m/yRKDmYB9j5etaXwlRatsQINAMBQes6P7zIIW4uSardpo7gvG07GJkbKHsKc coeV2jHITRAQ78WNu4kzjpTIjqqmSJQ6/+87m2l0=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3244/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can we make a normative ref to RFC8085? (#3244)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd1e0e2a7803_72623fabd28cd968919fa"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:08:05 -0000

I see RFC 8085 in the list of normative references already.  Was there something in particular that you think we should be explicitly depending on?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: