Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify and split the "malformed" definition (#3352)

Mike Bishop <> Thu, 16 January 2020 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E0412008A for <>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:12:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.455
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vW7lzlH9EOr4 for <>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4027C120071 for <>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:12:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=GGOZUUAWNxWm0a+KhH6KTAdjCKy8Iif/q3S+gbmIDTk=; b= qwQOl8mLl8niEDnlt4RkdOSMx3qvHuKDtTUFxQ8rSw7Cbw7Rg4Fa7RnKxXytnOWo dpLrGsojIF0jQwqTbUCZRaa01ILnMTyhQGasHxDFaR609QLGuPoBJoEF2V/X4MeD 1F+BV9xLKinm56Bzwgkymn/9/EDg0e1xaFMnw8tizHE=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1372p1las1-20576-5E20C398-38 2020-01-16 20:12:08.696114214 +0000 UTC m=+180168.964424216
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id XQ1KXFXuSaWMmFBG6pXS1w for <>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:12:08.614 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7266F400DD3 for <>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:12:09 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3352/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify and split the "malformed" definition (#3352)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e20c398711ca_29df3fe42e4cd9646709e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2OLmi6n3bf7bkafmWQIFd+vA5CAnGJshr2pz A3e5Yq+eCtXIfkJH7FLrrboYRLrLcSuo6Yyya+fPz0Hn4BXYjKcPqxuC8Crm4Gxfovd5OJjIv7kQDU 86c2e97P4+eRH5VuOm9co3mbyRdq3Oyg3fnUf3kBXV7hrORRl7cO+e6KTosU4qYRzSLI7USKhs23R7 k=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:12:14 -0000

The Message Exchange section required that a client send precisely one request per stream, and that a server send precisely one final response (preceded by zero or more non-final responses), but how to deal with violations wasn't defined.  This seems to fall in the same spirit of malformed messages, so I added that to the definition of "malformed."

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: