IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Require 8164 validation for non-https origins (#2973)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Thu, 22 August 2019 07:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA26F1200C7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jUYxEYhW4pj4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C90120169 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-d31a065.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-d31a065.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AF066049E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:50:26 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4JREBXJ64NYL3RSO53NN54FEVBNHHBZNTPCY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973/review/278245119@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Require 8164 validation for non-https origins (#2973)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d5e494221f3_5c243f9df7ecd9643238eb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OLXXKCpNZhgCluV-jv5SEGNItjo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:50:29 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.



> @@ -381,6 +381,10 @@ certificate for the origin before considering it authoritative. Clients MUST NOT
 assume that an HTTP/3 endpoint is authoritative for other origins without an
 explicit signal.
 
+If the client intends to make requests for an origin containing a scheme other
+than "https", it MUST also obtain a valid `http-opportunistic` response for the

I agree to what @martinthomson says. Unrelated and yet related I just fought (and lost) the Google Layer 7 load balancer because it insisted doing http health checks on a port that speaks websockets but does not serve http pages on the same port. In my case a tcp health check would have worked, but the point is that assuming that everything is http is not good.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973#discussion_r316539631

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email