Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove ack_delay_exponent TP (#2670)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 09 May 2019 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5551200E5 for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 10:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.393
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ee8MSHwfB5Hm for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 10:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B275B12006B for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 10:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 10:11:13 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557421873; bh=/Mbff1uQwMbggE1CeS1RBdj8hMsvdJWyEyI+wdimUks=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mgbfTjT57kKSaI19TJGRH1YtVU5DACt1+Lro7+Kdd8Jdx8NhloCT43I8lrbKS8PZu lYmHG/i2n++GRtETx8CDewN3Wg62TAiIwgjdWVog/fRz16px4l+B+gP5V1Hp+9cSqa oKhznKXxKieazbpKyqb3sM78umr2HeQ6u6bODdBQ=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2670/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove ack_delay_exponent TP (#2670)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd45f318eb04_7bc23fee914cd960987666"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 17:11:17 -0000

> The rtt sample that would result would not go lower than min_rtt, so it would only be 4.4ms if the min_rtt was <=4.4ms.

Good point. Thank you for pointing that out. Though I'd assume that having +-12% jitter between RTT samples would be common.

@mikkelfj Thank you for the clarification. I now see the confusion. I think I should have said "1ms granularity clock" rather than "timer". Does that make things clear?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: