Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK Delay and reference host-delay (#3971)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0B03A09A2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1BAAs3Q8hsmm for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-25.smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D3E3A081F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-39ac79b.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-39ac79b.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.18.15]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCA1840D7A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1596135887; bh=3Lk0vIRKR3yxeK74VFUfKQ5p6IQ8OjYPnweEgJyAptM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=oKrEWZaNOvKT6bkfvPhv9lD45WtcyjtQV8vNQyDkXloC5DsoLj4Y3xfE4rMcAQoBS 6+TSc9vj6xGiHbNxuy91CthLWcHzCn7HlBCOfQjjf/qv7UkEbDkmhWkm3JStlh+uB9 kXRj0fopby3Ee/FRzRKcBVt4hKyis9owRuNb5FMY=
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:04:47 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2IO4XP2NWTCFKMPC55F35M7EVBNHHCPTRR6M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971/review/458677596@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK Delay and reference host-delay (#3971)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f2319cfe0648_4dd216f853331"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OT6L0pNjvgLjaap5BBpsLX_E_1E>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:04:50 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.



> +: A variable-length integer encoding the intentional delay between when the
+  largest acknowledged packet, as indicated in the Largest Acknowledged field,
+  was received, and when the ACK frame was sent; see {{host-delay}}.
+  The acknowledgement delay in microseconds is the value of the ACK Delay
+  field multiplied by 2 to the power of the ack_delay_exponent transport
+  parameter sent by the sender of the ACK frame;
+  see {{transport-parameter-definitions}}.  Scaling in this fashion allows for
+  a larger range of values with a shorter encoding at the cost of lower
+  resolution.  Because the receiver doesn't use the ACK Delay for Initial and
+  Handshake packets, a sender SHOULD send a value of 0.

Thanks, I kept most of the existing sentence about size vs resolution, but otherwise took your suggestion @janaiyengar 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3971#discussion_r463209354