Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It seems the minimal packet number length should be 14 bits (#2955)

Kazuho Oku <> Tue, 06 August 2019 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17310120137 for <>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 23:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pvz31cWFoWm7 for <>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 23:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE78120018 for <>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 23:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 23:52:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1565074376; bh=04RBRav/p0trfmBHjjWDxv5eBuEYZwm0qMjFJrvIHNw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=OQ3jII6tL2tT92IT2+iO9YFtcDiqg5c/sp5pA9tlwv6UEYgFTcEVzOeqO/tapYx73 574DniHoTkHsfCOwtZLtTrb+V83GB+dI6vtlIiSXIgLfQbHhf9ZyI9pnTel2GyM7Aq AKmpfJ5BfZpw1AR8+jQmPsLPFFCiOuwOHHCACI1U=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2955/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It seems the minimal packet number length should be 14 bits (#2955)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d4923c87a191_31303ff8da6cd960854d6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 06:52:59 -0000

We already have a sentence that states when a packet number encoding of certain length can be used. Quoting [section 17.1]( _The sender MUST use a packet number size able to represent more than twice as large a range than the difference between the largest acknowledged packet and packet number being sent._

Therefore, I think that the only debate is if we need the 7-bit encoding. My preference goes to retaining it, because it would be useful in some cases, and because I do not think we have new information to reopen the issue.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: