IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease (#2205)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 07 January 2019 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE341288BD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:57:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.065
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GbdOvu7xcwLo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C2C612008A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:57:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=hCF0WeYjbb/7vEFiPn2DIq3bb/8=; b=hyX6CIeROdGuLfkm YVVg3W+PrBl2SjLFoelWmF+mykhuxnQz3Edz6eRGjIxtRY4jpGkSmiaVyK/av1j5 fuSfiNNKha0IGfaeicg3Rh6ilu6v6LuKQZPmigO1UJYkb9WPk09FGk5+Ph243arb JEUmK0Ww4TZi83MD079fN5pY2Oo=
Received: by filter0094p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0094p1iad2-24786-5C33AF32-31 2019-01-07 19:57:38.962791239 +0000 UTC m=+321775.270174831
Received: from github-lowworker-e8fa9ff.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.43]) by ismtpd0026p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id Xtp6GxxLSjS5WfTLx7WDRQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 19:57:38.904 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-e8fa9ff.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84E842033F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:57:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 19:57:39 +0000
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4cf52a6a531b67b96610f023fd938bb9310a6f5292cf00000001184b713292a169ce1762ed93@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205/452061707@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease (#2205)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c33af32d716a_6e563fca334d45bc101029"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2ws9IbBic3UFk6PIuHSqKIfjgF9rycoueXO/ 8INfJ+iRM8jdq68Oa1RtFTBn28ejiWAKlc0mvHw0gCTDqC8F9hWlbjEga0OkHigyqgebalKlLUY7es sO+voy6v6tMh38EZD/8C0h8YUorWE5VeLmY18U/sMQA8HMsx7JpiBxPPGJlHhHumQKIx+J3eCH1etD c=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OniHsBw2HhfXmwLeu3myQOuJFB8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 19:57:43 -0000

@gloinul 
> What I don't know if it is resolved fully is the implementation requirements is that a sender MUST be capable of handling an ACK frame with Largest Acknowledged that is smaller than highest received? From my perspective there are good and valid arguments why this may be required, however I think consensus needs to be established on that.

I am not sure if I'm following the context, but my understanding is that a sender MUST be capable of that, because we allow an endpoint to simply retransmit the payload of a packet that is being deemed lost; see #1612.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment-452061707

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email