[quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sat, 18 January 2020 02:18 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D32C120059 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:18:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nf9NOsCGUl4h for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75410120041 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-56fcc46.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-56fcc46.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.102.32]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9993E960230 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:18:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1579313901; bh=9MLuqZEPTHsOzrdbG4wbThhYFoZgrj40+nZW6uIc5Rk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=TgwFDqGNevnFlsf+gyoOQz0F7bMYFaeIeLhWCxXqJHTICD+28tJ9Mk9GNCRfMnUiE dobGw7klV+yhBY2t1Vk9OfDf7FlVEDsjTrS5AqCL9dLZJeBNUboICD+Dgj6mG/DtzA r1FRKFszCpJO+aBNcA8NdmvmID03IXgXsckalTyc=
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:18:21 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK55K7V77KFZUWFDUEF4F6OW3EVBNHHCBYTETM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e226aed8a7d6_79333fdc0c2cd9681418f0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OodnMqTuk_8VmxeN35ZWjn-9Fy8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 02:18:24 -0000
The presentation on low latency TCP options presents a way to convey max ack delay of ms, us and ns. I don't think we need to do ns(?) in QUIC, but it's clear datacenter use cases will want us, so I believe we should change from ms to us. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-tcpm-tcp-low-latency-option-00 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363
- [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in u… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be … ianswett