Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Require 8164 validation for non-https origins (#2973)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Thu, 22 August 2019 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A23120058 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EjeCCMkyGAwU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364F7120025 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:32:13 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1566487933; bh=s+hsU5H10C3zdRdBsQWb7f7cw01csvH55LzCRU4oYCM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XomPvB+Q7JaoYlKAVF1W8NS1KTIiuKZu3tCbymz7CTauhDvrjS+SH5KVtHHyoq461 seMUVbaKcF/zfktMkl1nt+f6D0r/JOAb7dPDrcQcG7PYblFYLNbYVlJf4HWdHoEz46 /Chs0qu0wORHhKbZmjlLxeq1gcwKEK/CeOtOx6/0=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK66NVFKUJEXKHYGU5F3NPT73EVBNHHBZNTPCY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973/review/278507043@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Require 8164 validation for non-https origins (#2973)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d5eb57d72ee6_46c73fc2fe4cd96097784"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OqFwNtBsR5vfxPmE0cExCZqDQII>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:32:16 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



> @@ -381,6 +381,10 @@ certificate for the origin before considering it authoritative. Clients MUST NOT
 assume that an HTTP/3 endpoint is authoritative for other origins without an
 explicit signal.
 
+If the client intends to make requests for an origin containing a scheme other
+than "https", it MUST also obtain a valid `http-opportunistic` response for the

Try this version.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2973#discussion_r316745333