[quicwg/base-drafts] Integrate QUIC DPLPMTUD text (#3695)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 May 2020 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5343A3A09EB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGIuT-aWzIc0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B513A09B1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-56fcc46.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-56fcc46.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.102.32]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEC0C60B3B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1590456086; bh=1d/T0KelXYbEROavN2aNOYoZ/f7F0PjxSCuQ/mrUmSw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=X6IHRQS/f+DKVi0U2SmEEPFg9qSnxDfReVfBzLYftemwno6m04I0vwgz7oxEhZlOK y36FTeR+qtfCG/N8AtjZds44fnYsmsQfIFYz4t7PczJk2ohk/Yh7iO5r2BK4+hyCVj QAHonpa+h8htvkbAl6E1qPUrgHlmfR7A83ZWvUuo=
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 18:21:26 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZNGFSSQKGCXYXXLIV43BIBNEVBNHHCKOOGDI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3695@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Integrate QUIC DPLPMTUD text (#3695)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ecc6f16cff38_5d5e3fbe842cd96812233eb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OurZcFDp-eZps1wky-nuaaL5gEw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 01:21:32 -0000

It turns out that coordinating the publication of all the documents is a real challenge.  Right now, DPLPMTUD depends on QUIC, which is fine, but it turns out that this is a problem for other things that depend on DPLPMTUD who now transitively depend on QUIC.  QUIC could adopt the DPLPMTUD text that is specific to QUIC and loosen this dependency chain.

The text changes are relatively modest, see #3693.

While this could be editorial, I think that this will require a consensus call.  The nature of the changes is such that it should be treated as design.  Also, I think that there are substantive changes required.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3695