Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retransmitted frames at the end of the queue? (#2374)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 28 January 2019 05:11 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609A2130FA6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:11:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8uKuIifvGIEz for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:11:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9AB0130FA3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:11:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:11:12 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548652272; bh=KLFyINeNvyfXELdZpEfEAVuSm55KpEgrKozLmiQbvuI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=gfvkZciEX63ehS3Mj4QrP34WGoUt6Ehcc2Pp/9IvSV/dHNdKFrnBsTUfProcPSzmS 4cK7yBdyyGN+QgWojwLBb2NzjucPhO3LQzLqTo5frxnY01rI/SSmZXad84zTHfOrqN axDNPToy9uh89k0NPmp1nd4oAmPhWgOlM9DKYiaY=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab73fac9caab5a2a76094a960aa7b773fea003779a92cf00000001186650f092a169ce180ef4ec@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374/458000836@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retransmitted frames at the end of the queue? (#2374)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c4e8ef0457c8_6dc83fc4578d45b812594a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/P1rJvAoajc959aL3cGVaXzPTM2I>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:11:15 -0000
Thanks for finding that @marten-seemann. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2374#issuecomment-458000836
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retransmit… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retran… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retran… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to place retran… Martin Thomson