Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC header format/demultiplexing (#426)

Colin Perkins <notifications@github.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07405129447 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QKf7BmeCC_mA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext2.iad.github.net [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0B41299FC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:05:07 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1490897107; bh=D44+nECyUUO3teJZiAx20BqU9Pb8JFVJH3JvqJz0ILk=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=lXGZIr7bt9pJOKBxy5XgkG+TEQ813T2Rd0nBEYAf+5apIFSlP2pZWxVxGKMMMx52q Yc3WbCoCbV3BoCdUBzRlqdauwiYaCyhqwYNvOiAICkDdaqroidDGTuFc7csqDUolty Mz/RckDthqDXnaPuC2meLNfrJ2yNWWR4OOKgYADw=
From: Colin Perkins <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab177194092ea8981b2ac8bcd25fd0d7566504fd0492cf0000000114f50ad392a169ce0d018204@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426/290494237@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC header format/demultiplexing (#426)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58dd48d370862_5c723feefff4dc3c23982b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: csperkins
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/P9J2IEWdGNSK0KcQtWK4OeJCqI4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:05:10 -0000

To be a little more general: we should decide whether we want to allow QUIC flows to be easily multiplexed along with some other UDP-based protocols on a single port. 

Multiplexing with the full WebRTC stack is one example of this, but is not the only use case. For example, if we want to enable peer-to-peer QUIC in future, then we should consider defining the packet formats to be easily distinguishable from STUN and/or TURN to help NAT traversal.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426#issuecomment-290494237