Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 05 June 2017 08:59 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2246129B9E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f09yYoP4Kcx3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3993D127B52 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 01:59:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1496653188; bh=l8mJkxt3yW/mkXidI/TiAQIrrghVpPRETqjRkzdTkM0=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=n3J3WuzyvEtuguUJlpK8IuooseaCxErPbzjjaodXI8XOAHCGzql6FmS77PRUItYyN t5nY0EykoFcy8BgmuDtMuNPNrGBCBe9kJA/W881/1STu6997RZjlgp5VTHDbbc/poR PkOqfoxCJHYJuDwy9nXZ6/l7/1LotQIb0WHQfGoQ=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb8a6deab490f80d2d5e14a6df157d7494e7be37d92cf00000001154cdf8492a169ce0de8f806@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569/306138727@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59351d8486043_18b73fc0ba4ebc30757c1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PEMUa-CqFf1hgsQjGufVXe9fOCM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:59:51 -0000
Yes, this is indeed unclear. I don't think that the protocol works unless you fix Version Negotiation across versions somehow. Marking this as editorial on the basis that this was assumed, not expressed, and that we merely failed to correctly write this down. (I don't see any other interpretation for this that makes any sort of sense.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569#issuecomment-306138727
- [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation pac… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation… Martin Thomson