IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Certificate compression (#134)

Mark Nottingham <notifications@github.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692A212944B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.393
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ugFNQN5E6R_K for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60DE312944F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=NoLM4YNb84LDCD9/JkrUPL29GWI=; b=vGUdphCvz1sQmXN2 DSexn9ws4cSrZmBgLdVTJq+HcLTqrRC7+KtasuRNKuxFIGdeqosRGZo1CjcTbntx JIJQZc3dA/TnoGSApxtsoJpDsQiYMXqU7vDEIp4jqGBJqRheLoNeGyg9UzAALeTL KZ8KtulJMnOxN9rVvrVqASlSjAM=
Received: by filter0980p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0980p1mdw1-13676-58CF370E-E 2017-03-20 01:57:34.18139624 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id nB_AOBkWQo-g_EnxInb-GQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 01:57:34.083 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:57:34 -0700
From: Mark Nottingham <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab83742ec46c350db09af50ab42607ddf171f366b592cf0000000114e6f90d92a169ce0be7a2a5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134/287666034@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Certificate compression (#134)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58cf370e397_32fb3f9b47745c301636be"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mnot
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1S7jERj1CRtcmwG68DradjfYho8hdkBDNgQc UgkM5WaJ//0apMbjMVmiRSR1K8K6bp/N54h6a8qKsH5Da9a4ZSA70w9T1+QJwEnh9sCJVyu6BIiUEi 0l6QQf8WymuOmkZ9cnGDbsR4DrmekiT/y84aMfmjH9Pz8JPzkcsCozNFB0HQdVoM36U8/QrLGaFkyq I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PEd5JSZYA4zdFuVA9WUVyqYrpGA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 01:57:37 -0000

My take is that we have enough on our plate without defining this too; it can be introduced later with an extension or a new version if it's defined elsewhere. 

In particular, I'd be concerned that adding compression would trigger a need for a round of crypto review, and as discussed before, the TLS WG is better at getting that.

So, I'm inclined to think we should close this issue with no action -- provided that Martin can remove the requirement (how's that going?). 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/134#issuecomment-287666034

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status