IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] IP Anycast with server IP+Port renegotiation (#560)

mirjak <notifications@github.com> Mon, 14 August 2017 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D443E13217D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 03:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WbOTcFaABLKz for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 03:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743FC1320E3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 03:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Fi2MxVMMe6p9x22G3cEzzgq1JPY=; b=dIMaxEU1QEf5an0u 8+iBQbfxjEnMhYjk5bVjQYmpcpweMklKo6q1H5n/LcUna1qWHIlI5hK8f481Zg4E 7SEgvO4BgmBrGUaZL3Fd5k130dViEGFk3n3oJ4ThOa7MuSdaGt97x1GBfWCXSSxz UQCPO4RfoUnokMpLTAnZEjG6SUo=
Received: by filter0527p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0527p1mdw1-30272-599177EC-11 2017-08-14 10:14:04.30884544 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0026p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 9SHArU3xR1qDlSDiLaaTrw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:14:04.371 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:14:04 +0000
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab17c00e89810da1720ab007a09c3232357301e2a492cf0000000115a939eb92a169ce0dd2a43a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560/322153305@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] IP Anycast with server IP+Port renegotiation (#560)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_599177ebf1f38_2853fadcea4fc344413b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2/uIkrdoxnLbXMcnuN9eXXe8GxYoOzcC4SJO 86C9CkQe9lKdqiFYZ4lB9icgZiJsD6LFxQX4xByJMcdvMiTOlcx2SigMa2YSKcgGoKsP3oRH99OqlQ n7WUZQtr9VLR7PppDZfN6O52u+uATgOLRznIlVCh5swBpTRiXqxprVV9HLYDPFAnMKmm0dEyXJy+h5 A=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PJS9MSVDofgk1S0z9Dt-EuQozS0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:14:23 -0000

One side comment, I think any make-before-break solution is basically multipath, and as such we should make sure if we design such a mechanism that it can also be used for multi path correctly. So yes, we shouldn't design multipath by accident but if multipath is what we need for another feature that we would like to support, we should design it as providing both.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-322153305

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status