Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nonsensical MUST on frames fitting in packets (#2603)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F64F12032A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X_1mnwePqZio for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73052120330 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:01:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554926477; bh=OxNZaZSW2ceAkftxpNOo9+JI5uSEbeFoizDZzGWFWIA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=V4KI/ZsXVEsZPQlFKyR5+a8wn+dT2G4if2Jn53ZSxr6cG0th/kzb5nwSFa3qu45OV UhZwcFvUUuEBHSdpAeXTDuEPwiD0EC3wNJIYRcB/FNfbJOK/q5Ak82OVA07M2s1qJv 5rk1mqAI5k48BO1GOVuH/LYfas/hBcu8eTDETa8A=
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcd738d721113cd696c40331a76596c7379ac944f92cebabb7e0d92a169ce19b4b084@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603/c481840579@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nonsensical MUST on frames fitting in packets (#2603)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cae4b8d5db2d_2b113fb7394d45c42307ec"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PK1msSFGZjSi2arq1rL0yEL62AQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:01:20 -0000

I've answered this very question, including recently, to people who were trying to understand QUIC framing. The text is definitely not nonsensical, and unless you want people experimenting with making frames go across packet boundaries (yes, you _can_ do this and use packet numbers as a way to reassemble pieces of a frame), I'd keep the MUST. I don't see a reason to drop the MUST.

This isn't editorial. The MUST is not implied anywhere.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2603#issuecomment-481840579