Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints never requests a CID (#3252)

MikkelFJ <> Thu, 12 March 2020 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428433A0D29 for <>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQ2xP1gT4iyD for <>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBC53A0B2A for <>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:28:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584030480; bh=rnT6lN0CVM7nBY05YKjS2tF83216m4Hz/scz4ijWXN8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QBfVb0dXRyBRI36MPWdJSTmuzRoRoma8UkHLNvUfB93ZNHr+QNmT+hFBDM14n0pYE sxDnTQl5CobDd+kCdL/L+c9U33UmPRcK/BGDMYzdrHG1ds0ifT5mQSolMLs7jj4eyI rx3DpW5tdeoALWADee8v7Mx4fCw2EMDYA2LXm214=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3252/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints never requests a CID (#3252)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e6a6310d1a22_a1a3f985cacd96831109e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:28:03 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

> @@ -968,10 +968,10 @@ failures in the presence of peer connection migration, NAT rebinding, and client
 port reuse; and therefore MUST NOT be done unless an endpoint is certain that
 those protocol features are not in use.
-When an endpoint has requested a non-zero-length connection ID, it needs to
-ensure that the peer has a supply of connection IDs from which to choose for
-packets sent to the endpoint.  These connection IDs are supplied by the endpoint
-using the NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame ({{frame-new-connection-id}}).
+When an endpoint uses a non-zero-length connection ID, it needs to ensure that
+the peer has a supply of connection IDs from which to choose for packets sent to
+the endpoint.  These connection IDs are supplied by the endpoint using the

No, they are supplied "to" the endpoint.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: