Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Editorial suggestions on the Streams section (#2730)

[ianswett <[e-mail]>]

ianswett commented on this pull request.

Thanks Mike, I addressed or accepted most of your comments.

> @@ -244,8 +245,9 @@ x (*) ...:
 # Streams {#streams}
 
 Streams in QUIC provide a lightweight, ordered byte-stream abstraction to an

I'm not sure I want to make that change and I'm not changing that sentence at the moment, so if you would like to change it, I'd suggest a separate PR.

> @@ -335,8 +337,9 @@ the flow control limits set by its peer.  Flow control is described in detail in
 Stream multiplexing can have a significant effect on application performance if
 resources allocated to streams are correctly prioritized.
 
-QUIC does not provide frames for exchanging prioritization information.  Instead
-it relies on receiving priority information from the application that uses QUIC.
+QUIC does not provide a mechanism for exchanging prioritization information.
+Instead it relies on receiving priority information from the application that
+uses QUIC.

I added this, then removed it because it read somewhat redundantly.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2730#pullrequestreview-252946609