Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Default settings in HTTP (#2038)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Thu, 22 November 2018 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B55130ED4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 02:22:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4H-uc4OsKLbW for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 02:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E63128B14 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 02:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 02:21:59 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542882119; bh=vNCoXP2I1h6S1RdTzIehGvrtZ9tPAoCC1uct6dbSeH4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Fb0/dNBP2ceS9OT01sMcLptUMw1N0L+fhAD0LaroA6lFzemfH7aTKmxquL5tdGKtq a8LZwgrO258XwWdOvoc/WElzHyp+ND0rOQPi4sS1mGwd1obdTs5wj7F9ReSpmP1wc4 yHj+IlBBYtAuBKZ3XfuVrvmvnHHF6rdMpSnkYMcw=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab098aac19777caf7e68603e6f0f54ca685d08250892cf00000001180e454792a169ce16d8e664@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2038/review/177580770@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2038@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2038@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Default settings in HTTP (#2038)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf6834791cf1_1ae63f94aaed45bc8944a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PiaQlF295qD1M5zzwiSGh_Qh3pM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:22:03 -0000

LPardue requested changes on this pull request.

At a high level this seems ok. I've made some minor comments, feel free to accept/ignore at your leisure.

My only concern with this is that HTTP/3 extensions that require SETTINGS will introduce some blocking when compared to the vanilla HTTP/3 - this might make extensions less attractive to deploy. However, I'd expect most vanilla HTTP/3 deployments to want QPACK, and require SETTINGS exchange... my concerns are probably misplaced

> @@ -660,7 +658,7 @@ HTTP_MALFORMED_FRAME.
 The following settings are defined in HTTP/3:
 
   SETTINGS_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS (0x3):
-  : This value SHOULD be non-zero.  The default value is 16.
+  : This value SHOULD be non-zero.  The default value is 0.

So I never understood why the old value was 16. Zero seems ok but this line, on naive, inspection reads strangely "Should not be zero but is zero by default"

> @@ -678,12 +676,18 @@ Additional settings MAY be defined by extensions to HTTP/3.
 
 #### Initialization
 
-When a 0-RTT QUIC connection is being used, the client's initial requests will
-be sent before the arrival of the server's SETTINGS frame.  Clients MUST store
-the settings the server provided in the session being resumed and MUST comply
-with stored settings until the server's current settings are received.
-Remembered settings apply to the new connection until the server's SETTINGS
-frame is received.
+An HTTP implementation MUST NOT send frames or requests which would be invalid
+based on its current understanding of the peer's settings.  All settings begin
+at an initial value, and are updated upon receipt of a SETTINGS frame.  For
+servers, the initial values of the client's settings are the defaults of each
+setting.

Could you improve this with a more concise statement, such as "For servers, the initial value of each client setting is its default value"?



> @@ -678,12 +676,18 @@ Additional settings MAY be defined by extensions to HTTP/3.
 
 #### Initialization
 
-When a 0-RTT QUIC connection is being used, the client's initial requests will
-be sent before the arrival of the server's SETTINGS frame.  Clients MUST store
-the settings the server provided in the session being resumed and MUST comply
-with stored settings until the server's current settings are received.
-Remembered settings apply to the new connection until the server's SETTINGS
-frame is received.
+An HTTP implementation MUST NOT send frames or requests which would be invalid
+based on its current understanding of the peer's settings.  All settings begin
+at an initial value, and are updated upon receipt of a SETTINGS frame.  For
+servers, the initial values of the client's settings are the defaults of each
+setting.
+
+For clients using a 1-RTT QUIC connection, the initial values of the server's
+settings are the defaults of each setting. When a 0-RTT QUIC connection is being

Change to be consistent with above (if above was accepted)

"the initial value of each server setting is its default value"

> @@ -1014,12 +1014,12 @@ represented as an 8-bit prefix string literal.
 QPACK defines two settings which are included in the HTTP/QUIC SETTINGS frame.
 
   SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE (0x1):
-  : An integer with a maximum value of 2^30 - 1.  The default value is 4,096
+  : An integer with a maximum value of 2^30 - 1.  The default value is zero
     bytes.  See {{table-dynamic}} for usage.

So I've just noticed this setting defines the default to have units of bytes. Do settings have units? Suggest you lose the units.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2038#pullrequestreview-177580770