Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 06:59:11 -0800
From: Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4ab89318dc5d065037457c1b3c050ecec53748c30b792cf00000001184b2b3f92a169ce1762ed93@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205/451961932@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease
 (#2205)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c33693f1666a_3e7c3f80146d45c4188993";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Prb2uV9qUQ1ib_8w_9be8lF-Gv0>


----==_mimepart_5c33693f1666a_3e7c3f80146d45c4188993
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yes, the ECN related issue is resolved. 

What I don't know if it is resolved fully is the implementation requirements is that a sender MUST be capable of handling an ACK frame with Largest Acknowledged that is smaller than highest received? From my perspective there are good and valid arguments why this may be required, however I think consensus needs to be established on that. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment-451961932
----==_mimepart_5c33693f1666a_3e7c3f80146d45c4188993
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>Yes, the ECN related issue is resolved.</p>
<p>What I don't know if it is resolved fully is the implementation requir=
ements is that a sender MUST be capable of handling an ACK frame with Lar=
gest Acknowledged that is smaller than highest received? From my perspect=
ive there are good and valid arguments why this may be required, however =
I think consensus needs to be established on that.</p>

<p style=3D"font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&m=
dash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thre=
ad.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href=3D"https://github.com/quic=
wg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment-451961932">view it on GitHub</a>,=
 or <a href=3D"https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq9aL=
lK9snbsurklfGUu1u3pF4wFIks5vA2C_gaJpZM4ZZLl3">mute the thread</a>.<img sr=
c=3D"https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq235V5YSECHuhXZ8GJq4CR1w=
rvKYks5vA2C_gaJpZM4ZZLl3.gif" height=3D"1" width=3D"1" alt=3D"" /></p>
<script type=3D"application/json" data-scope=3D"inboxmarkup">{"api_versio=
n":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name"=
:"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"=
quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"http=
s://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avata=
r_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/=
avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/q=
uicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@=
gloinul in #2205: Yes, the ECN related issue is resolved. \r\n\r\nWhat I =
don't know if it is resolved fully is the implementation requirements is =
that a sender MUST be capable of handling an ACK frame with Largest Ackno=
wledged that is smaller than highest received? From my perspective there =
are good and valid arguments why this may be required, however I think co=
nsensus needs to be established on that. "}],"action":{"name":"View Issue=
","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment-4=
51961932"}}}</script>
<script type=3D"application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment=
-451961932",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment-45=
1961932",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>=

----==_mimepart_5c33693f1666a_3e7c3f80146d45c4188993--