Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Relax requirement of detecting duplicate TPs on receiver (#2691)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 14 May 2019 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDA01200B8 for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.464
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jfDOKrwWXiAv for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C77120026 for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 18:47:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557798458; bh=YExuTw6DF+hOxyG2l2YodTiWP+vCSr8a5ezsmXhEBTU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Nrv1CTbrEazwWRgoou5m66Sb35IKVTmScQXc66lL6S6T/FWBZojKtGNDbN+JjTdpj G+3jG1osQwlNZy+FN1vMlQyLv4pPFfx5nkkGEIMk8qaAfIcmP9NmAo/UvIwtR/LtSs KkkuAyPalAq2zn4ouZOYqqxBA0+OdvdHHL+TITGk=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2691/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Relax requirement of detecting duplicate TPs on receiver (#2691)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cda1e3a6062_52423fa0ec0cd95c2586bb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 01:47:41 -0000

The spin here is interesting.  An endpoint should be able to track supported transport parameters.  Also remember that once we start to approach 300 transport parameters, there is no more room in the client's Initial packet for other stuff (like keys).  The server parameters don't have the same constraint, but you might reasonably assume that the same limit is coming.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: