[quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction between token types (#3128)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 22 October 2019 02:55 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759C312004F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0dp9zxA3ble for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7988012000F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:55:04 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1571712904; bh=Cf7pMmky0XtySyFuS+XTDj3fxgMvcGZThrHoSzcyw+0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xPjyDANC3wz2iu0EtQ5WX11NDrvfxUayXJGugYPoDM7XUDnIwvtu8qKvDV6blHdXt XG4JWf/ELa5lMH0aVdNa5eWbOo1gsyc9dKDiEvN4BVzR8WBmVLAQL/rC6JA4PqjKhM 7gFT4sND2BgF0VlHyUHWwkH9gq28X60LFfLJWnxo=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4TCNSVEUR67O3XWHN3XORAREVBNHHB43A2P4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction between token types (#3128)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dae6f88c825c_27dd3fa0ad6cd968141682"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PwLCgR0OKXIHxagQ7gbPOFHZe0Q>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 02:55:09 -0000
Closes #3127. Question for reviewers: do you think it necessary to point out that this distinction doesn't need to be hidden from other entities? That's almost obvious based on the way that this results in different behaviour from servers, but should it be written down? You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128 -- Commit Summary -- * Mandatory distinction between token types -- File Changes -- M draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (7) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128.patch https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Kazuho Oku
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction betwee… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandatory distinction be… MikkelFJ