Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix to ECN section regarding validation (#2113)

Magnus Westerlund <> Wed, 12 December 2018 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B91612777C for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:50:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EGo-Z5BkMRsW for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C21A130DBE for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:50:14 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1544611814; bh=Ud03QRLbq0zcYu0/40/x1LxkBiGL0A7h4PgdFLhFz88=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=M0FT2fwGShDvA/Zr6KwuDqf1za1ZNmPhTqUnKzp9kZmRH1pLXiB1pg0OGTCbl8Zfb yGrCx7jmKh2zhCrvwVV9cjjyPtMi6Tav1DsymeAaO31uVtU7ormC3jqoKAblFNnjJg /PrjSFl/M8HP/jBtyWkrRZjm5fhHF8DdEQnrTMyY=
From: Magnus Westerlund <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2113/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix to ECN section regarding validation (#2113)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c10e7e6b710c_41633fae35ad45bc1051d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gloinul
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:50:17 -0000

gloinul commented on this pull request.

>    Not-ECT.
 If a sender receives an ACK that contains no new acknowledgments, for example
 due to reordering of the ACKs, then ECN counter comparison SHOULD NOT be
-performed. Also if sender do not have state to determine if a particular PSN
-is newly acknowledge or not, then the comparison SHOULD NOT be performed.
+performed. If the sender does not have state to determine if a particular PSN
+is newly acknowledged or not, then the comparison SHOULD NOT be performed.

Sorry, yes I will try to use PN in my comments. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: