IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a server cleartext packet after the client has sent a finished message? (#829)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 04 October 2017 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FDF13422B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.181
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.181 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ni3koZs4pyhl for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30CEF132076 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=8bnCdTg0Wy5LHq2luYWlNg3yqnk=; b=iv9dC8O7Fir+7ih4 gk01Ur83XE12E3zwJCysvexzuJWzF26OTcqX1kz+YAqgTOiT+a2tlv21rB1idR2M KzXCI3wgG5ySCbF2kgCEM8Vrxq2l9yK14lF+ycTapODObHoIOv3gcrxJBWXYN7gj P49aSNlADnK5lo/r7oHYHsrgkU8=
Received: by filter0621p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0621p1mdw1-6226-59D51528-1 2017-10-04 17:06:48.16618386 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id XtMaEdl-QsSZdnTM3IEzZQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 17:06:48.128 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 17:06:48 +0000
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4e993823bb2129ccb8557138275501f098d7f07592cf0000000115ecd72792a169ce0fa74353@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829/334223695@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a server cleartext packet after the client has sent a finished message? (#829)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59d51527c8a66_432f3ff60b8c8f34629e2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak10hZNHjgmNzvVPkrYGXgncFDFa59Rk0KOvRA CxZZxsUXYjE8YSFrPTHCAqJA1jjFfv4ePCMxp3LZJDRafdVtDx+xuhle6b5NhEjBA8k2KK9ehr2SaL p7GhZvdWUkp5rNvmH5O3ZbKlXsPUC/NS1hDQu7Gcmxg0sVlp3jftEKYFq7f4Pc9P6Qr+SESOHDtX9C 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Q0NilcV7RGC-l9lgu5khqInzaLc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 17:06:50 -0000

@janaiyengar 
> Why did the server (Quicly) not move to 1-RTT and send the server ack in a 1-RTT packet? That's what I would have expected.

ACK for the cleartext packet that carried ClientFinished was sent in a cleartext packet that carried ServerFinished.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829#issuecomment-334223695

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status