Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use the FRAME_ENCODING_ERROR for errors in frame encoding (#3042)

Kazuho Oku <> Mon, 04 November 2019 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9951200C7 for <>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 20:46:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.122
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Q8UFoX_VGns for <>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 20:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92F71120046 for <>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 20:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883D96A0E34 for <>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 20:46:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572842765; bh=UfMKLoZZuLpzCeL6kZGd7uBqe6zrfd+vu7w7r5x4BSw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tHrNBARnJgvAtWdPXEtUdivONcGDJWNDZeAh+aBsc7vZvILDGfholJs2ypQ/JBo5j MKShGcGAmqvglzYYkoT5YEukTvaL4otBXDyM8RJ1dnnPAPc5W6DScRJdaj0dXGlnUr DVMjZyp7ATe06LjL/1VrAUXRCppk/bK49mDe/CrE=
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 20:46:05 -0800
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3042/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use the FRAME_ENCODING_ERROR for errors in frame encoding (#3042)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dbfad0d79204_685f3f89a2ecd964661271"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 04:46:09 -0000

@marten-seemann Are you suggesting that the CRYPTO stream has implicit limit of 2<sup>62</sup> bytes that can be transferred? I think my question is how you would justify it. My claim is that it's an unnecessary complexity.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: