Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon Initial packets while server can still send initial close (#2541)
David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Sat, 23 March 2019 06:09 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766921277D8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xxa7jUFg65ML for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13AD31224E8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:09:10 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1553321350; bh=RavV/tB25SKBJefDAAXEij2JEG9PdWWlysR9GqpXlEU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=y1KsRweXZFv6Ar8UAUYO3PRf5p0TReq0NIVH8rLyOPRbqLhRMK6oRG/6bS897dxvA fo2S59sK0RM7hv+Av+X4GxiT61bn/SaRs+ARttUZzJODjhXDRv9vgyrDuLzfgs5nun SQGFaEKEDduT9F/gpSln2TFZTqm+BV7A3zJu0Cvw=
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab16dc9b04e103326d4e189dafc115735332d2f3ed92cf0000000118ad8f8692a169ce1943f1d8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2541/475843070@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2541@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2541@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon Initial packets while server can still send initial close (#2541)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c95cd86c3071_28bf3fb1db0d45b84242d9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/QU2wWmedPolWVcR7xeJuKhr7QnY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 06:09:14 -0000
I agree with @nibanks. Keeping the initial keys around for longer opens up a DoS attack vector. Instead having the server send CONNECTION_CLOSE with all the keys it supports sounds safer, and using a coalesced packet can make that efficient. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2541#issuecomment-475843070
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon Initi… mjoras
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… mjoras
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clients cannot abandon I… Martin Thomson