IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] define compound packets (#1262)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1C3129C51 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.282, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpByzk5bNNQR for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A811273B1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=TbzJyJg5ke53CDfW012ZRGs/x/c=; b=rLZ2svLdVKi7rt76 sMS7cLOhALj656LOTycRPwEnaHbH8+HrdzZ4QxU1F65vmiwMRBbhsvj7vXcG3K1z J/M5VY3URCq5PuZuTpyCUV61cVEaiH/Ckrrt2MWZ2yNhpJmVzhQEeJmjpHPGpImT Fr6V4r6oFPe5XQtPozAVdx+l3yQ=
Received: by filter1131p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1131p1mdw1-7855-5ACBB0CC-1E 2018-04-09 18:28:28.365990865 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id eC7MB04lQCGnGI0v_Iuoeg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 18:28:28.379 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 18:28:28 +0000
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0a6119cfbe328fd1dbdcd6fcf878bd036d598a4c92cf0000000116e372cc92a169ce128c773a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262/c379848730@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] define compound packets (#1262)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5acbb0cc4b4ef_7efb3f96c3a1cf2c2897fd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3SRDU/mlHxIEfzxATtxTaejlqceyqhArOPAX AUxV6cR1nmxQH442As9T0vWtMIy6R8HInCSmN9hu8dqwHq9T3SOmbd2nNr8ghi1nwoJO0cvjqcCRk2 DC/n2NTxEb9GGwbHHpk+x2pW8Ypw0/jSJLReYWHYn2UjjI10xjxaUkNhEA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/QWJTEqYxN5Dd5krN6QRwMqokaX4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 18:28:32 -0000

This seems OK, but why bother to have extra packet types. We've already expanded the long header quite a bit to make room for the two directional CIDs. Why not just add a length varint and have only one header form

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262#issuecomment-379848730

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status