IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 November 2019 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6800120033 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:25:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FdA0SlrW3fyH for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAD712000F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-39ac79b.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-39ac79b.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.18.15]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7764D1C0D5E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:25:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572920715; bh=w3dAieTTy+8XJ7ZS5qAUDdB3a+KfEp+jgFZUwGUTKg4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=lkUS1w4bTNdmlulbmrP96oZz/m7fbDO/82CUMnJ26Fy0qqaxZXKnHRKkJIXEgpPtC cL6514cVK9RHcBSo7azRXQdfNnYArltstmRwy6ruhaOHoa09P2dq/5qwLrLZOWJ7E7 s7eBoML8vGfIRVLv7CNvanp+L/p9C8gwxBQURWP0=
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 18:25:15 -0800
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYYJFR22X3TJNT6XK53ZYIAXEVBNHHB5VOOHI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189/549634907@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC lacks on-path exposure of packet loss (#3189)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc0dd8b69227_1dce3fed24ecd960775a1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/QekZxTIR43mo46yUs1G1HyLBN3k>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:25:18 -0000

Specifically, we discussed this in Tokyo and decided to not pursue this for
QUICv1. From #632: "Tokyo conclusion: this requires something more concrete
and anything about this is not going to happen for QUIC version 1."

I'll echo Martin's comment -- what has changed?

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:30 PM Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> Yes, that comment also says "this is not going to happen for QUIC version
> 1".
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189?email_source=notifications&email_token=ACUOBVH3JXVPAWQ6IEV5BG3QSC5DXA5CNFSM4JIXQLJ2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDBGBUI#issuecomment-549609681>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACUOBVBTKSG7MWBIQKPAYGDQSC5DXANCNFSM4JIXQLJQ>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189#issuecomment-549634907

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email