Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit CWND increase in slow start (#3232)

Vidhi Goel <> Fri, 29 November 2019 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB45012020A for <>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXkbDWG-Pxtf for <>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5720F1200DB for <>; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:55:01 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1575014101; bh=ky9VAdtaZ8fbX2Pp7yC4OVqdbAG6pthNwSoKmS+rffA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=N0nY7RRp3j5NDGESBDqmU0IUOh8gBC9ka9/J62yV4Wx73w1JMoGu5C91DtVM80ObH IlxPo9nflmfcd+wZTF7jgo2vwt/oRh91vbB3+/v3gi6MpUrJbkyTTR0olFtK8PB80l g43H0N2z4h4YfEzBnTLwxjEIEjI3lSpGwQJuQ8t4=
From: Vidhi Goel <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3232/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit CWND increase in slow start (#3232)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5de0ced56b2be_7b383fe99c0cd9682805da"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: goelvidhi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 07:55:04 -0000

goelvidhi commented on this pull request.

> @@ -769,7 +769,10 @@ Implementations MUST either use pacing or limit such bursts to the initial
 congestion window, which is recommended to be the minimum of
 10 * max_datagram_size and max(2* max_datagram_size, 14720)), where
 max_datagram_size is the current maximum size of a datagram for the connection,
-not including UDP or IP overhead.
+not including UDP or IP overhead. An implementation that does not use pacing
+SHOULD limit the congestion window increase during slow start to

sounds good to me. Updated it

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: