Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 20:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DB1130DEB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvJwpE2HVYgJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4465E130E62 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:20:42 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531858842; bh=0W2A4y/VKw5Y+AHcozxx0KM/gzYZ4yoORCqBUasIVHU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BKxzOZOAwcrtAQA1U8/co2DtCvKXd8LyPF/0IX+8f6W5sE3+7RIXZ6xUcYQ0Vw7dL xfRs6eXPKLbbFoCrNRVtfBn9NdiQcsx2ouNMPCKTmjKQzDELBL6wjYimQMSHC/ugTm pH+zlmsYiKYvJisqX8EyUcDx4JJq9USmmc4CX5qU=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab56530f3b8d66e8a02a6613d7a8f3aa7996abacf292cf000000011766119a92a169ce14638397@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579/405714642@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4e4f9a9d14c_cee2b14c917af581466d6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Qnl2CSLfA6vMd0jqY_Qi86kLjS8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:20:45 -0000
Additionally, I would like to go as far as saying Initial packets MUST be acknowledged in higher encryption levels (or implicitly). Then, the server would only have to handle Initial packets from the client that are for the initial CRYPTO payload. Otherwise, imposing the 1200 byte limit requires decrypting the packet. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579#issuecomment-405714642
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Num… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham