[quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility (#1260)
Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com> Mon, 02 April 2018 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2DB12D864 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IclgHsli0KRp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354BD126DFF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=P+6X8+WtghsoObdCsX3HMHzqHUc=; b=Ghp50Su3XepmFnDm zVyiB0E65WKDOx/PgtgUxtI3lPGaHfT2QTBlMJAV0WDSAYX+AVUNUg+xB2HjWvIn IMR5AnW8+O0XIKxa/7Z1K7TI0FWHG5i9RE53Z02ARkyUzqvRcihAm7lWuAdeJbpp Omgz7msqfLH+FhOO2p+lKDKiAbo=
Received: by filter0259p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0259p1las1-26765-5AC277AC-E 2018-04-02 18:34:20.298543605 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) by ismtpd0021p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 7O8HRTyJRD2Yti2f4ImJzQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 18:34:20.216 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 18:34:20 +0000
From: Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abd642723eca5f586a75aef2c325eb420e1746c41b92cf0000000116da39ac92a169ce1282df76@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1260@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility (#1260)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ac277ac289b5_756c2ad70d5aaec413552a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: pravb
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak04zUAhQ39FfjIDtH8XRytyXwVU65L2WfY/uO IDLpkg85S6R83OXKan5o9ETRQJ/X0Tvr0geW9DAZKTCYJYulpGWkAtZik0nyOlyBNMZvgpRHgDO4z/ I4BDDX/wEFl/YTctxHNZXqCQ5i5XBSfZsxUQiG5mrYp/D8wPE3VD6ebN/4JQMG8Go9X70mq7eDsKtV Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/R5wr2sREbJrrtXFig_Nz6LwTBTA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 18:34:23 -0000
If future versions of QUIC require us to add more fields to the invariants, how would we go about it? Would we add the fields after the PN or before it? We lack a field that specifies the offset to encrypted payload start and there will be no more reserved bits left if the spin bit experiment is successful. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1260
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility (#12… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility … Praveen Balasubramanian