Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion period: text and pseudo-code don't agree (#3972)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sun, 02 August 2020 02:05 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28B43A0AB6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 19:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rV5EnJWLVAO8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 19:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-15.smtp.github.com (out-15.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8B83A0A9E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 19:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.25.52]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441547A0057 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 19:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1596333954; bh=gkNZKMbXIAsNfvmBazVt1IqOvW8iS9xxYb88bzsxYjA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=jGW6Gxk0wzG2MX0j9MxAI/5EkDCtpjZhXlinNfYU034f9Z37ThtOwUxq+70AR7u5Y hm1xbr7p2WmqdNi2BBximflw3pwVLrwzZYy6PofnFf9D0cy4BrutiqB6vF/6O3W4MC 6J9qDWY5Lcysfit4TX0itw46LGtlqZz1T0UD1ePc=
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 19:05:53 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK324BHPPLFOTRMG2PN5GIAIDEVBNHHCPUC7GA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972/667612818@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion period: text and pseudo-code don't agree (#3972)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f261f81f283c_7aa616f81004af"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/RI0Sof_DOR1hG8dT1d47rT66IFM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 02:05:57 -0000
Given what I've heard, I think this is heading in an editorial direction(fix the pseudocode), though that needs a PR. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972#issuecomment-667612818
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Lars Eggert
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion period… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion pe… Jana Iyengar