IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make EOED transmission optional in QUIC, please (#1518)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 14 August 2018 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A6B130E10 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E5ykERwuGBaG for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19495130DC1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:35:50 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1534286150; bh=LgPmP6T15oOWC86hnwLRLW/DZNJXKpL3Eqyf8pzsXVk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QwuhMPzRneAslxdmQXXolvzjjSWffvO9tH9hQQ1V0ctFWrSoeHD8d+OB7pCEIVcSd RxomiYwEn47wgfr5sDEZgEGIP6w46EsreQC6/aXFhJn4ejexvZKuDPumte4pESRlZ3 XdxeA+yNCixu0MBnwMAVZ559h2HROjziF1hWeF1c=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcfa66256133d2d78a8c8a9269d1db7d23aa313c092cf00000001178b1b4692a169ce1427404b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518/413037952@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make EOED transmission optional in QUIC, please (#1518)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b7359467156e_76d23f9aa10d45b411156"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/RdKbm5U7NzN443ZqVda8HLQs3qc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 22:35:53 -0000

My current thinking is that we should make it QUIC v2 and try to convince someone to spend the time to do the correctness proofs in that timeframe, so we don't need this forever, and possibly prove we don't need CFIN as well.  And whatever other warts we have discovered in this process.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518#issuecomment-413037952

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status