IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider simplifying Packet Number Encryption (#1575)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFF2130E44 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-TM2_kLZIV5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA57B130F20 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:22:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531851767; bh=BE74hxFRDMG/NAzMZHvjoxgNmcVrc8ntkjStkJ8lSE8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=a1DVlc5CRW8nJviICEYlym+jkkXOhdcUdCADsXN1ONBOQX8/JUlP6oPpqaKr6xcta gw+aNdZX1b/boPjuq4mrhxoiWDJVUdMlWIschT5chjRPRHANxVIkpsak4n0j1utyzd ONuxg7/XREpZh5a3epHkHHSh0vv60N26y/jGbCWk=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcc7e63c101194e0433c1b4ff2b6f1dfb7504d32e92cf000000011765f5f792a169ce14620d9d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1575/405680109@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1575@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1575@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider simplifying Packet Number Encryption (#1575)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4e33f7527df_47b03f9a55be0f8066102a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Re9s2HE_h5gBcXINdV7HOtQa6QM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:22:51 -0000

I think that this is purely editorial: the draft doesn't actually describe a process for decryption, just points at considerations.  Are you suggesting that we recommend a specific method?  I think that any of these options are fine.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1575#issuecomment-405680109

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email